There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?
There is a variety of musical styles are listened around the world today. It plays a crucial part in human’s life for many reasons and I would argue the importance of traditional music over modern, international music.
Music is the greatest creation of man and the key to creativity. It inspires us, expresses and arouses our feelings as well as tells us stories. It is believed to be a unique way for people to express themselves. Victor Hugo once said “Music expresses that which cannot be said and on which it is impossible to be silent.”, through music, people can express their feelings whether it is love, joy or anger . Moreover, listening to music is also a popular kind of entertainment worldwide. It helps people relax after working long hours and find the peace in their minds. Some other kinds of music such as pop or dance music usually used to warm up parties and bring joy.
From my perspective, folk music should be valued over foreign music which has become so popular among young people nowadays. Each country of the world has its own unique identity. As a result, music from all over the world differs from region to region. A country’s traditional music features its history, custom and culture, which is the reason why it is exclusive. On the other hand, almost all the adolescents are keen on international music today due to globalization. This kind of music is catchy and fun, but it is a marketed product and is sold for business purposes, which makes it impossible to compare with the value of traditional music.
In conclusion, music plays such an important part in our life that we can hardly imagine the world without it, and I strongly believe that traditional music is much more important than popular international music.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | ahmadrava88 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | vyvynguyen116 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Muhammad Nur Cholis | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nevermore | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Garrett | 73 | view |
- The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 67
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 73
- The following pie charts show the results of a survey into the most popular leisure activities in the United States of America in 1999 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 78
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eelings whether it is love, joy or anger . Moreover, listening to music is also a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89108910891 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79632351629 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8511770585 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.625 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477052412405 0.244688304435 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163529357775 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112494616143 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339089235277 0.151304729494 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978616847996 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.