Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
How far do you agree?
What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
In rapidly growing world, people can find jobs in diverse employment sectors with quite enough salary. However, it is noteworthy that some workers that have crucial position in our life as nurses, doctors and teachers are underestimated and their income compared to actors or bosses are almost negligible amount of money. Unfortunately, this situation is one of the global problems in my view, I completely agree that distribution of salary in these sectors are quite unfair. However, I am going to support my view by analyzing this problem and define criterias that can be beneficial in right judgement of professions.
İt is well-known that workers are not paid due to the heaviness and importance of their works. Film stars, bosses have been taken mandatory advantages for years even if their work are not considered as essential to our life. İn contrast, the most vital professions which has effect on human development and human health mainly underestimated. Salary that are paid to doctors, teachers are quite less compared to actors or company managers.
İn order to define criteria for giving much fair value for different employees, their working experience, career and importance of works has to be considered as essential criterias. Likewise, people who takes massive responsibility in our society as teachers and doctors have to be awarded for their work.
İn conclusion, everyone must see the importance of different workers and judge their value correctly. The criterias that have been mentioned should be considered, no one have to be undervalued. İncome of all people have to be proporional to importance of their work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | hoangnm | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Shrasth Kumar | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-09 | zohre-h | 60 | view |
| 2017-10-08 | BLACK WOLF | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-12 | Monica1 | 67 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the projected for costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects ar 68
- These days more and more people are going to other countries for significant periods of time either to find a job or to study There are clearly many benefits to doing this but people who live abroad can also face some difficulties Discuss advantages and d 76
- annual coffee and meat consumption in 7 countries 95
- Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, so, well, as to, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28136882129 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92511855863 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574144486692 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9615194776 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19589172022 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735265071927 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553403189025 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116981193662 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197632907705 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.