Patently, advertisements are attracting the consumer's attitude to tempt them to buy the target goods
everywhere. Across the globe, undoubtedly, huge profit suffices that companies invest in this crucial
issue. I agree that action interferes with consumer`s decision to buy unnecessary things. However, few
things are advertising in this way and, of course, are vital in modern life to purchase.
The prior reason to grab the consumer's attention is that ads try to present the suggested device or
custody necessary. Adds insist on this device is essential for everyday life and without that some
doings go wrong. Being healthy or beautiful is their logo and they attach the advertised goods to this
logo. Consumers think without it they lose further than spending on it. From my experience, we bought
a silly device for decreasing weight last month. The seller claimed during two months everyone can lose
weight appropriately. This company knows the importance of losing weight in the consumer's mind and
by this assumption push us to buy it, even though that claim was completely a lie.
Another reason is fashion. Some times individuals think that goods are necessary because ads
equalize prestige and pride with having suggested device. In other words, they feel strange for not
having a harmony with their peers. As a simple example, having cell phone is a fad, it
is an essential thing nowadays though. Not having a mobile number is a shame, even if the owners are
primary-school students.
Notwithstanding, Adds have a great positive effect to inform people wanting and searching new
products to use their time effectively and comfortably. There is no option better than adds to introduce,
as an example, home appliances to release busy house-wives to cater their children.
To sum up, to do perfectly it is wise to make a balance between what the people really need and what
the real message of ads present. If a society exaggerates each side of action, it will, definitely, waste its
budget and decline progression.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 52
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
- The Table and the Bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- Some people say that success is 10 percent talent and 90 percent hard work Is hard work the key to success or is talent also important 61
- Today high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...ntly, advertisements are attracting the consumers attitude to tempt them to buy the targe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...rchase. The prior reason to grab the consumers attention is that ads try to present th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, really, so, of course, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22522522523 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84173271336 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636636636637 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2357404407 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132610204846 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357915282627 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041595582979 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0333640048331 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432307403321 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.