In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Correctness criteria and efficiency criteria are important at work. Works that achieve both guidelines are considered successful. In most cases, however, these two goals contradict each other, choices have to be done.
I disagree that it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct, even in today's world.
First, working quickly does not necessarily leads to higher productivity. Productivity is calculated as the rate of producing successful products. Since there are risks of making mistakes, working quickly is not as productive as expected. Taking a clothes factory as an example. The process of manufacturing clothes contains complicated steps. If workers work quickly, they could be some error. If in any steps an error is made, not only the time spent in this step is wasted, but also every time spent before this step. Also, finding an error requires extra time. Thus, working quickly may not be more efficient than working slowly.
Second, some jobs have zero tolerance on correctness. A small mistake can also be devastating. One of this type of jobs is flight safety check. Any mistake on a flight can threaten the safety of crews and passengers. In today's world, jobs of this type are increasing. Working correctly becomes the top guidelines in many jobs today.
Third, working slowly ensures constant production than working quickly and risk making mistakes. Although it is undeniable that people in today's world are pursuing work efficiency, making mistakes are not their intention. That is, people in today's world would work more quickly only if the risk of making mistakes is not increased accordingly. They would rather choose to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct since this remove uncertainties from their work.
In conclusion, compared with working quickly but risk-taking, working slowly but ensuring correctness is still more important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expl 75
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expl 63
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reason 83
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...t, working quickly does not necessarily leads to higher productivity. Productivity is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'clothes'' or ''s'?
Suggestion: clothes'; 's
...not as productive as expected. Taking a clothes factory as an example. The process of m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, third, thus, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27564102564 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73245403666 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3612383197 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.5833333333 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 20.6045352989 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54166666667 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.619125674253 0.236089414692 262% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172763810139 0.076458572812 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20469375772 0.0737576698707 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385357473344 0.150856017488 255% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.277060273027 0.0645574589148 429% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.