agree or disagree: Teachers should not make their political or social views know to students in classroom.
It is undeniable that the impact of teachers on students is a popular topic which has caused heated debate in a long period because it may affect everybody in his or her daily life. Depending on the personality type, personal experience, and emotional characteristics, people differ greatly in their attitudes toward this issue. As far as I am concerned, I agree with this statement that teachers should not induce their social or political views to students. In the following, I will try to explain the specific reasons which I think are the most common viewpoints nowadays.
To begin with, one of the compelling reasons that justifies my opinion is that students are influenced so much by their teachers. It is obviously clear that in the case of teachers’ impact on students, Thus, the more the teachers dictate their social or political views, the less the students can tolerate think about other comments. For example, my brother goes to elementary school and his teacher has huge impact on the personality which is forming inside of my brother because when we talk about different things he just refers to his teacher's views and we never have any chance to make him sees issues differently. Thus, it seems that students' mind in such ages are highly delicate so that teachers' opinions can change their perspective will be remain forever.
Another equally notable point supporting my opinion is that talking about political issues in the classroom leads to students' distraction. For instance, I remember when I was in high school, if teachers were discussing political issues, for the rest of the day, I was thinking about those issue. I now realize that those discussions had a significant impact on my concentration on school materials. Thus, I think it is better for the class if teachers concentrate on the teaching process rather than sharing their social or political views.
To sum up, by taking into account all the above factors, we may reach the conclusion that teachers should not induce their social or political views to students because students are influenced so much by their teachers, and also their focus on studying will be effected.
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 66
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 61
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir perspective will be remain forever. Another equally notable point supporting...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, talking about, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03611111111 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75932621718 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536111111111 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5378648118 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.461538462 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6923076923 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362422221391 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125245747902 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105105695659 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22920444197 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480702270955 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.