Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
I believe that society should make an honest effort to conserve the biodiversity of this planet. It is essential to save the plethora of plant and animal species, and maintain an ecological balance. If this involves the utilization of extra effort, time and finances, then it should definitely be employed.
The homo sapiens are undoubtedly the smartest species on planet Earth. We have made great strides in the way we lead our lives. From inventing better, faster ways of transportation to settling communities in faraway lands; we have achieved a lot in our lifespan. But, on the way we have disrupted the fine ecological balance of the planet as well. These human feats have led to shocking disruptions in the habitats of various plants, birds and animals. This has led to several species becoming extinct and still others on the verge of extinction which we classify as endangered. By encroaching upon their geographic area, spreading pollution, contaminating their habitats we have treated our beautifully rich flora and fauna with utter disregard. This absolute indifference to conserve the natural environment has seen an increase in lot of man made disasters the biggest example of which is global warming. Hence, it is all the more reason that humans should expend some effort into rectification of this problem. Our natural resources, once depleted or extinct, cannot be replenished by any human effort. Therefore, we should dig into our compassion for our fellow inhabitants of the planet and try to conserve them.
It is important to maintain the biodiversity of the planet since the interaction of various species with one another is like an intricate clockwork. Any imbalance or disruption can lead to various deleterious effects all round, which can also translate to a huge threat to human life in the future. Every animal and plant species has its special place in the grand scheme of things. The disturbance in the food change can destroy the whole ecosystem. It was said by Einstein that if the honeybee becomes extinct then it will be a few years before the whole human race perishes. Honeybees seem like a very insignificant species which seemingly does not have such a huge influence on human existence. But they play the very important role of pollinating various flowers which contributes in a huge part to the varieties of fruits and vegetables we consume. If they were to go extinct our food options will get seriously restricted. Similarly, the endangered status of various other species acts like a warning signal to us to pay attention to the harm we are inflicting on nature.
The idea of spending so much effort, time and money on saving some obscure species might seem absurd to few groups of people. After all, we can spend all that money for better services for ourselves like better healthcare, investment in public infrastructure or in the creation of jobs for people. Investing in these might seem directly more beneficial. But it is a frankly selfish thought. Nature has a way of balancing without human intervention. But if we toy with nature, then we have to go out of way to set everything right as well. Planet Earth is the only body in the whole universe which supports human life. If we start losing habitable conditions then there will be nobody left to worry about jobs and money.
Hence, we should not take the threat to our ecosystem lightly. After all, money can be generated and economies can be rebuilt. But it difficult to replicate nature and revive extinct species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Kutumba kasyap | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | tulipkatie | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Shivgovind | 55 | view |
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 62
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather an 43
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However,since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot permit 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 856, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es of fruits and vegetables we consume. If they were to go extinct our food option...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... some obscure species might seem absurd to few groups of people. After all, we can...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, frankly, hence, if, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, well, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2942.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 591.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97800338409 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76843978862 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 306.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 933.3 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2160113896 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5294117647 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3823529412 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1258136998 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338156929558 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467723194833 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866242703841 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757118691522 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.