oil comsumption
A number of oil kegs used each day by four main regions, namely US, Western Europe & Japan, China, Middle East, over the 21-year period from 2009 to 2030 are depicted in the line chart. Generally, oil consumption in the Middle East and China is expected an increase whilst that of the other two regions is predicted a decrease during the period shown.
Interestingly, there was a completely opposite in daily oil consumption between the Middle East and Western Europe & Japan. In 2009, it occupied around 4 and 2 million kegs by former and latter, respectively. In the next 16 years, evaluations reveal that the figure of Western Europe & Japan will decline gradually while the Middle East will rise moderately and both of them will encounter at around 3 million kegs in late 2025. After that, it is forecast that the figures will continue to evolve according to previous its trends, the former will use just over 2 million kegs and approximately 3 million kegs for the latter.
In addition, from 2009 to 2015, the US employed around 10 million barrels day by day. However, estimates indicate that this figure will drop suddenly over the next 15 years, standing at just above 4 million. In contrast, over the first six years, there was a noticeable growth in Middle East consumption and they are anticipated to continue to climb in the coming years.
- The crime rate among teenagers has increased dramatically in many countries. Discuss some possible reasons for this increase and suggest solutions. 89
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 96
- Discussion the reason why people define happiness differently and how to obtain happiness 57
- The chart below shows average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities 56
- The crime rate among teenagers has increased dramatically in many countries. Discuss some possible reasons for this increase and suggest solutions. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84848484848 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58413824565 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3597417634 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634342864349 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328162130594 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472007343915 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496640496806 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472938837353 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.