The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For many recent years, a huge amount of financial aid has been given to impoverished nations to help them deal with poverty. Although this solution may help in some aspects, I personally think that the problem could not be handled completely by giving money and governments should implement other alternatives should be deployed.
It can be clearly seen that the solution of pouring money into destitute countries has many drawbacks. The first point to note is that the money may never reach people in need. In many developing countries, the lack of transparency and ability to lead the nations of the management systems are causing prevalent corruption in government structure. As a result, politicians and government officials become those who are benefited instead of their citizens. In addition, the recipient countries mostly are not capable of making the best use of monetary support since they may not have enough skilled manpower, technology or infrastructure to develop with the money given. An illustration would be my country, Vietnam, which is still a developing country yet we have owed billions of dollars to foreign nations. Furthermore, in some cases, the poor countries will become dependent on donor countries as they have been used to getting help from other rich countries. As a consequence, the receiving countries become increasingly more dependent on their givers and more heavily indebted.
On the other hand, there are still some certain positive sides of this scheme. It is undeniable that the donations provided by developed countries have definitely helped accelerate the economy of the poor nations in some extents. Moreover, foreign aids have saved many lives in those countries which usually suffer from disasters and diseases every year.
In conclusion, donating money to destitute nations may improve the situation in some ways, however, it is not a comprehensive solution and other kinds of help such as changing the constitution, promote education and healthcare systems as well as combat corruption in order to handle the problems properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-08 | Harkirat123 | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | Harkirat123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-11 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
| 2017-10-31 | lenguyenynhitk | 84 | view |
| 2016-03-10 | TSEB | 90 | view |
- The graph shows typical levels in enthusiasm confidence and ability of students attending a ten week IELTS course Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 92
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 73
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children's study. On the contrary, those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental and physical development. What is your opinion?Give reasons for your answer and 61
- Some people say material possessions are very useful in bringing us happiness but others argue that they are useless in terms of providing happiness Discuss both views and give your own opinion and reasons 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, still, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34042553191 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87299810743 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580547112462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.117144169 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261872687221 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833634051823 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060441246734 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153472510993 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425624856825 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.