The above statement recommends that society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. I do not agree that the efforts of society to protect the endangered species should be conditioned.
Plants and animals are disappearing at an alarming rate. It is a fact, more than five hundred species disappeared in less than two hundred years. This should be a call for all mankind to make an effort to save the endangered species since it is critical to the stabilization of the ecosystem. Animals and planets are vital parts of the natural system which we depend on, it is unreliable to assume if any species beneficial and critical to our existence or not since our scientific knowledge is not comprehensive, and there are many species are obscure but critical to the web of life.
Hence, it is our responsibility and our promise to the future generations to maintain the ecological balance on the planet we live on. Humans are the dominant and more advanced creature who has the most vigorous impact by using natural resources far beyond their naturally-sustainable levels. Also, the urban expansion, pollution, industrial waste, excessive use of fossil fuels, and much more, adversely affect the whole ecosystem and induce many environmental problems to the environment. So, since humankind has been active in the deterioration of the ecosystem, society should take an action to cure these effects as much as they can.
Moreover, they have the power and the tools, as technology and science, to protect the ecosystem and save the endangered species, either if they are under the risk of extinction as a result of human intervention or by natural causes. Endangered species often face extinction as a result of pervasive diseases, which may wipe out a large extent of animals or planets. The human intervention should deter the effect of these diseases by the use of scientific technology and research.
On the other hand, there are many natural factors which exacerbate the problem which we can not control, such as, hurricanes, floods, natural fires and other natural disasters. Moreover, there is a universal law state that the survival of the fittest, which assure that societies efforts to save the endangered species cannot keep up with the power of nature. Also, there are species that their extinction place no harm to the ecosystem balance, such as Dinosaurs and Mammoths, this may doubt our efforts to save some endangered species which their extinction may be harmless, especially if these efforts are costly.
In conclusion, societies should bolster any efforts to protect the endangered species. Particularly, if the danger of their extinction is a result of human intervention.
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 62
- So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 68
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 23
- Scientific theories which people most consider as facts almost prove to be inaccurate thus one should look upon any information describe as factual with skeptism since it may well be proven false in future. 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11227154047 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88401500621 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467362924282 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9786601391 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533244611176 0.243740707755 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178669988873 0.0831039109588 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199793876545 0.0758088955206 264% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341309795399 0.150359130593 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.2258523966 0.0667264976115 338% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.