Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Some
people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to
pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cause environmental damage. Other people
think there are better ways to stop the companies from harming the environment. Which view do you
agree with and why?
our hectic life. People are always to make their lives more convenient, healthier and successful. Some people believe that in ordered to protect our living areas, companies which damage environment should stop, while others are convinced that these companies provide important goods and it is better that they pay a penalty such as higher tax. After carefully pondering it from several aspects, i strongly agree with the latter idea. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
First of all, obviously, these companies are producing the basic and important goods for people. As a matter of fact, if these companies stop, people encounter with a lot of problems. To illustrate this fact, on needs only refer to result of this decision which people buy their essential products with high cost because after stopping these products should import from other cities or even countries. Seldom does this decision bring people benefit. Although these companies damage the environment, what results from stopping them are to enhance the rate of unemployment among people because most people miss their jobs. The noteworthy intelligible results, which conducted in our country, show that the high percentage of people missing their job due to closing companies, are ones having a lot of problems in their live.
The second reason why I agree with it is that, undoubtedly, the money gained by penalty such as increasing the amount of tax provides an opportunity for governments investing these great deal of money on renewable energy. The modern world offers abundant examples of governments which install solar panels or wind turbine are bale to decrease the consuming of fossil fuels. Hence, if I were to be a determiner in our country, I would have established a center to investigate the negative effect of each company and estimate tax based on their damage and consume these taxes on protecting environment. In addition to aforementioned notes, there is a well-known proverb in Persian, The equivalent of which in English may sound like this" the more government use the renewable energy, the more people would live longer"
To make a long story short, no one can deny the enormous positive effect of increasing tax for the companies that damage the environment. Not only do these companies could provide essential goods for people, but also by paying penalty, they are able to contribute in protection of environment. For this reason, I highly recommended that all companies help government to make better life condition for next generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-23 | 30vil | 73 | view |
| 2017-11-13 | mehrdad.imnnn | 81 | view |
| 2017-11-13 | mehrdad.imnnn | 85 | view |
| 2017-11-13 | mehrdad.imnnn | 88 | view |
| 2017-11-13 | mehrdad.imnnn | 81 | view |
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money toonly one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people in 73
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why? 73
- Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Somepeople believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them topay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cau 81
- Young people should try different jobs before they decide which job or career they will choose in the long term. 76
- Do you agree with the following statement? The government should supportscientific research even if there’s no practical use. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
our hectic life. People are always to make ...
^^^
Line 2, column 778, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...their job due to closing companies, are ones having a lot of problems in their live....
^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...reat deal of money on renewable energy. The modern world offers abundant examples o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, well, while, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2119047619 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75481335096 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.2660147727 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.764705882 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225021237057 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711048210491 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079516065669 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145552718537 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410129437224 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.