Do you agree with the following statement? The government should support
scientific research even if there’s no practical use.
Since the dawn of civilization, research had had one of the greatest roles in progression of each society all over the world, for it has had one the most prominent influence changes in our lives. Although some people believe that government should allocate money and support scientific research, I concur with the idea that it is an obligatory task for government to support these research. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Firstly, it is undoubted that so influential has having knowledge been that it has had a great number of positive effect on each society, yet above all it has helped government to have a valuable knowledge resulting in huge development in future. To illustrate this fact, one needs only refer to number of technology which were not practical, yet they are so precious. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better, there are a lot of achievements in physics which the number of scientist worked on that sequentially, and by doing so, people are using them in their lives such wave technology which stated by a scientist in Germany and discovered by another scientist in England. I do believe that had government not supported theses project, we would not have had the current technology.
Secondly, it is established beyond that on the one hand, some people believe that government waste money by investing in project which do not have any output, yet one the other hand, some people believe that it helped countries to publish advanced papers resulting in attracting more students from all over the world to study in their university due to the fact that it brings more money for country. Therefore, I strongly agree with the latter idea, and I do believe that the more university would be high-ranked, the more companies want to university to do their projects. By way of illustration, the noteworthy intelligible results, which conducted in our country, show that approximately 90 percentage of universities participation in big and advanced projects, are the universities which are famous due to their background in doing scientific and sophisticated research.
To make a long story short, by considering all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that no one can deny the enormous positive effects of accomplishing advanced scientific research on progression of each society. Not only can they pioneer in science among world, but also they can bring money for their country. For this reason, were I be determiner in our country, I would established a center to support these projects more and more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-02 | mehrdad.imnnn | 73 | view |
| 2017-12-02 | mehrdad.imnnn | 73 | view |
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are moreimportant than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree withthis point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to supportyour answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor. 73
- In order to succeed in doing new job, the ability to adopt someone to new environment is important excellent knowledge for this job 73
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child (5-10 years old)?1. Being helpful 2. Being honest 3. Being well organized 90
- some people like to buy a piece of technology as soon as it is available in the markets. do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...ince the dawn of civilization, research had had one of the greatest roles in progressio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...knowledge resulting in huge development in future. To illustrate this fact, one needs onl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ney for their country. For this reason, were I be determiner in our country, I would...
^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'establish'
Suggestion: establish
...I be determiner in our country, I would established a center to support these projects more...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10256410256 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95944041256 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477855477855 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.4461072575 48.9658058833 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.384615385 100.406767564 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.6045352989 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120461367877 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451121837901 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491554243947 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737969678663 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311514547233 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 11.7677419355 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.