The reading and the lecture is about Ethanol fuel, and the writer believes that this biological fuel will never be the replacement for gasoline in the USA. However, the professor is optimistic about the Ethanol fuel, and he thinks this will be the next alternative of gasoline by refuting all hypotheses claims in the reading.
First of all, the writer points out that, since like gasoline, Ethanol fuels also produce carbon dioxide, which is the main reasons for global warming, during the burning of them, it is unlikely be an advantage for the environment. The professor, on the other hand, avers that even though ethanol also produce carbon dioxide, the process from which Ethanol come is a environmentally friendly process. He also says that as like all trees cron trees also absorb carbon dioxide for their food process, this will be the compensate for the carbon dioxide emission from engine. Thus, this fuel is really a great alternative of gasoline.
Secondly, the author posits that because of extremely use of corn plant for making Ethanol fuel, there will be a scarcity of food for the animal that rely on it. However, the professor rebuts this point by mentioning that since the element which need for foul production, animals are not able to digest it, so those can be use for production. Also, the two process can continue in simultaneously and earn handsome profit from it.
Finally, the reading mentions that ethanol will not able to stand in the market due to its high price, and if government cut the subsidy, people will not go for the ethanol at all. The professor disagrees with the author in this matter and informs that if the production of plant grows, government help will not need. Moreover, he also says that a recent study claims that if the production of ethanol increase by three times of the production of now, the price will be 40% less, and which is very convenient for the consumer to use it.
- TPO-32 Integrated WritingStarting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog 70
- TPO-49 Integrated taskLike many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be na 66
- tpo 22 80
- Tpo33 71
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business. Which would you choose to buy? Give specific reasons to explain your choice. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the process from which Ethanol come is a environmentally friendly process. He al...
^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...de for their food process, this will be the compensate for the carbon dioxide emission from en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
..., animals are not able to digest it, so those can be use for production. Also, the two pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82282282282 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49262997559 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4999253285 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409855014009 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169208234893 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814266255551 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26621411548 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174138098632 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.