The statement argues that it is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them, while it seems persuasive, but it is evasive and not truly a cogent statement. Undoubted, it depends on the belief which would be comprised, moreover, the cause which engendered this compromise.
Compromising own values and beliefs will lessen self-confidence and tarnish the reputation of the person. even more, it becomes an insidious cycle; the more we compromise our values, the more we continue to do so. For example, an employee who compromises his values and involves in corruption, he might involve in other illicit activities for the sake of better position or the money. Also, a student who might yield to his classmate and involve in cheating for the first time, this might persuade him to cheat more often instead of spending his time on studying for the exams. Thus, it is important for the person to be adamant about his values and principles, to maintain his self-esteem.
In contrast, true person, who is in pursuit of the truth, should be critical to his own beliefs, and open-minded to all other views. Only by experience, people tend to change their beliefs when they expose to others beliefs which are different from what they advocate. For instance, many of the beliefs which a person attain in his childhood by his parent and his society may change when he experience different ideas and thought which make more sense to him. The human superiority came from their ability to choose their own faiths and beliefs. Truth cannot be reached without critical thinking and persistent search, so it is more harmful to adhere our beliefs blindly, than compromising our beliefs when they are proved to be wrong.
Thus, while many beliefs and values are worth adhering to, many should be questioned and analyzed to prove its validity. So, a person should adopt critical thinking and comprehensive analysis of his beliefs and values because they affect his way of life, And more importantly, it is for the health of the society to be open-minded and accept different beliefs and values. For example, if the society is more conservative and not yielding to different beliefs, people will not accept others, As a result, discrimination or antagonism will be dominant.
In conclusion, while it is healthy for the person to be restricted to his values and beliefs, compromising these beliefs as consequences of deep thinking and reasonable causes is healthier.
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 49
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 50
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 66
- A recent survey of 250 adults between the ages of 30 and 45 showed an association between the number of hours adults spend online each day and self-reporting of symptoms commonly associated with depression. The survey found that adults who spend 30 hours 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...d tarnish the reputation of the person. even more, it becomes an insidious cycle; th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...rent and his society may change when he experience different ideas and thought which make ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing and reasonable causes is healthier.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04622871046 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7872572842 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489051094891 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6269251008 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.625 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194497241362 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766248109182 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564149909312 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13394862419 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741614699158 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.