Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are a rich variety of art styles all across the world and they represent the history of each nation in various ways. People have different views on the issue of devoting an amount of money to the artists by governments as opposed to private resources, I believe that artists should be supported financially by the governments.
There are some persuasive arguments in favor of the governments' financial support. It is believed that different types of arts are the national identity for nations and it is a way to introduce the culture and customs of the host country to other countries in the world. A salient example of this is London, that supports its artists financially and they earn a large amount of money by exporting their pieces of art to other parts of the globe as well as holding musical concerts which could boost the economy of the country up to 30% in 2008. Furthermore, artists have no particular resource for income and consequently they need the support of governments in order to access prosperity and become renowned among people. I believe that if artists have no anxiety and stress for making a living they would be more motivated to focus on their work and create fabulous pieces of art and it would bring fame and money for them in the future.
On the other hand, there are some strong arguments against this issue. Some people assert that government should spend money on more important schemes such as health, education and social welfare that enhance the quality of people's life and it is not targeted only a specific group of residents, so the average quality of life will improve and poverty will be eradicated and a majority of residents of urban and rural areas will be pulled out of poverty. Moreover, there are affluent funding buddies who are interested in investing money on art and they are enthusiastic to support artists by running exhibitions or purchasing their pieces of arts.
In conclusion, not only governments but also the rich people should support the artists, it is futuristic and wise to help them since they make the future of nations and they can be a good source of income for governments in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-03 | VivianL | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | poonehnikpour | 73 | view |
- You rented a car recently, but were not satisfied with it.Write a letter of complaint to the rental agency. In your letter Introduce yourself Explain what went wrong with the car you rented Ask for some form of compensation 78
- Some people believe that competitive sports, both team and individual, have no place in the school curriculum. How far do you agree or disagree? 81
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel another country to learn about it. Others argue that all the information is available on TV and the Internet. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion. 73
- Because computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- In many countries young people don t choose the teaching profession What do you think is the reason What could be done to attract more students 45
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81016042781 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60074126526 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.1320292582 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.545454545 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 20.7667163134 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24052203658 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983799194084 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726207117905 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15824322554 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366664129756 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.