TPO 34
The reading specifies that there are three theories about the main cause of the extinction of the sea cow. However, the professor explains that we cannot find out what make sea cows extinct and presents some evidens to refute them all.
First, the article claims, sea cows were a good source of food for native siberian people. Consequently, they hunted many of sea cows and after many years they extinct. The professor opposes this point by saying that the sea cows were massive creature and weight ten ton and capturing couple of them could feed many people for a mouth. Also the population of native siberian were few and it was not vital for them to capture large number of sea cows.
Second, based on the reading, ecosystems disturbances which declined the main source of food of sea cows and these changes help its extinction. The lecturer asserts that if sever ecosystems disturbances happen and declined the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal. But, native people did not record any food shortage. In other word, the ecological changes near Bering Island did not affect the sea cows' population.
Third, according to the reading, when European fur traders come to the island, they had many weapons that allow them to capture and kill sea cows and because of this sea cows extinct. The speaker contradicts the idea reasoning that the population of sea cows decreases before European fur traders come to the island. Hence, it was another main reason that trigger the reduction of sea cows population and European fur traders did not have a role diminish of sea cows population.
Therefore, the specific reasons mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | rassata | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | ellen87713 | view | |
| 2022-01-30 | omega93 | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | vida00 | 80 | view |
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 65
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait until the class or meeting is 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 71
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hem could feed many people for a mouth. Also the population of native siberian were ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changes'?
Suggestion: changes
...lined the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...ar Bering Island did not affect the sea cows population. Third, according to the re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8724137931 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40259718766 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9406760346 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.928571429 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.606752459436 0.272083759551 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235700259956 0.0996497079465 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110344544711 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305596462921 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156940410604 0.0443174109184 354% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.