For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
For each country, being developed is a goal. In fact, governments try to provide advancement and a modern country for their citizens. Of the determinant factors measuring the eagerness of each country to this will is how much money a government spend on their education. Considering this issue, some people are inclined toward the opinion that it is more momentous for a government to spend money on the teenage education than to spend money on universities. Personally, I do not subscribe this perspective owing to the fact that satisfying and solving the needs of dominant job seeker community, who are mostly the youth, is more important; what is more, universities are targeted to develop and produce new technology. In what follows, an in-depth discussion on each of the abovementioned reasons is presented.
The first and possibly the most important reason why I believe that a government should spend money on university education is that it is normally believed that universities are responsible to expand and promote the technology in a country. Usually, each university is targeted to develop a special technology or innovate something new. Indeed, universities besides teaching responsibility, they are supposed to develop and enhance the technology in the country, while teenage schools are obliged to teach their students. It is crystal clear that the financial aids seem more needful in universities to conduct costly projects.
Another significant point springing to mind which deserves some words here in corroborating my notion is that students are interested to attend a university in order that they can find a job. They have to conduct plenty of projects and do hard homework to gain a specialty in the course of 4 years or more. In fact, their desire to build their future life is more than teenage students in the school. Ergo, a government should provide enough money for universities in order to each university student feel happy thereby being in university and keep him/her hope and wishes alive.
To sum it all up, by taking all the aforementioned grounds into consideration, we may logically draw the conclusion that not only are university students supposed to develop a country development, but their ages and desires need more considerate and attention.
- TPO 31: Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 75
- TPO 29:To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 66
- TPO 34: Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phones, online games, and social networking Web site. 76
- TPO 31: Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 75
- For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, while, in fact, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20596205962 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03702037809 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531165311653 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2539223158 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.066666667 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273438759081 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09594180824 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102794645426 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152656943973 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109834255023 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.