Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
"As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate."
Technology has definitely shaped the world we live in. It has given us access to people and places we could not have thought possible before. However, is it deteriorating our thought process? Technological advances help to decrease human labor. It lowers the time we spend on daily tasks and transfers that to tasks that can help better the world. Furthermore, it expands our horizons. However, some technology does make us too dependent.
Technological advances were seen to bring a prominent change during the industrial revolution. Compare how the slaves in Egypt built the pyramids, and how we build our buildings now. Due to the inventions of machines, the need for harsh human labor has decreased tremendously. Furthermore, the pace and efficiency at which products are made has allowed firms to reach people from all over the world, and at greater quantity.
Inventions of many machineries have allowed us to lower the time we spend on daily task such as cooking, cleaning, and transportation. Technological inventions such has the microwave or oven allows us to spend more than less the time heating up food in comparison to heating it up using a coal-run stove. Furthermore, we are able to travel a greater distant faster, allowing people the option to live further away from work or school.
Furthermore, technology helps to better our lives and expand our ideas. The invention of apps allow us not only to find the closest food or clothing outlet, or transportation; it can help save our lives. There are many apps out there that can instantly contact the local authorities in case of an emergency. Additionally, there are apps that can help track your location so your friends know where you are at all time if you are traveling somewhere unknown alone.
However, technology does create some sort of dependency. Students are seen more inclined to use calculators even for the simplest math. It is as if we have lost faith in our intelligence and are addicted to the idea of “100 percent accuracy”.
Technology definitely changes how we live our lives. Whether we like it or not everything we do now-from cooking, transportation, or running the economy-technology allows a means of a better standard of living. It can also help to save or defend our lives. However, it has its down sides; it can be addicting. We trust technologies to give us a near perfect score, which can often blind side us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 53 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e further away from work or school. Furthermore, technology helps to better our lives a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99507389163 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98872317367 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532019704433 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0131217495 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0552184500794 0.243740707755 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0136752341624 0.0831039109588 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408646613563 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0300718635672 0.150359130593 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358370964589 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.