TPO 29:
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Enhancing learning process and educational activities are of the most important issue each government face. There are plenty of solutions to meet these objectives. One of the controversial methods is increasing the professors' salary. Personally, I subscribe the idea since this method can motivate professor to enhance their teaching methods; what is more, it makes professor avoid pursuing a casual job in order to meet financial needs. In what follows, an in-depth discussion on each of the above-mentioned reasons is presented.
The first reason why I believe that universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors to improve the quality of education is that a well-paid teaching position like a university professor results in a personal motivation in the professor to pay more attention to her or his teaching techniques. That is to say that when the professor earns a high salary, the professor tries to present a highly effective teaching in response to increasing the salary by university monetary department. On the other hand, professors feel more committed to the university and students in order to render a better teaching and educational procedure thereby receiving a well-paid salary.
Another significant point which deserves some words here in corroborating my notion is that this way can cause professor avoid undertaking another job. To shed more light on my vantage point, take the following example. When a professor cannot find the salary his or her university pays him or her insufficient to meet the family needs, sometimes some professors try to find another job like a casual or part-time job. In my opinion, this is the worst thing for a university professor that focuses on another job in addition to academic activities. Somehow, having another job distracts her or his mind, which can have a detrimental effect on her or his teaching activities. Giving professors more money make them not to pay attention to another job or finding another way to meet their life requirements and needs.
To sum it all up, by taking all the aforementioned grounds into consideration we may logically draw the conclusion that not only can enhancing university professors' motivation in teaching, but also concentrating their mind in teaching and academic activities be result in increasing university professor's salary. Of course, it should be noted that increasing professors’ salary should be based on the assessing and monitoring their performances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- TPO 29- Integrated 80
- TPO 31- Integrated 80
- TPO 31: Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 75
- TPO 37- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 90
- TPO 30:It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...controversial methods is increasing the professors salary. Personally, I subscribe the ide...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, in addition, of course, in my opinion, what is more, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3578680203 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12922342087 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4782408628 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9375 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189506996194 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639245518089 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863427570434 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122923283764 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982107813942 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.