The provided chart gives data of housing preferences among people who lived in three different cities in UK in 2005. It is obvious, that people in compared cities had different living preferences, however flats have been the most preferable place to live for all people in London, Oxford and Cambridge. it is also apparently seen that terraced houses showed opposite results.
It can be clearly seen that living in the flats in London in 2005 was the most preferable type of household with nearly sixty per cent, however living in detached houses showed the lowest percentage with about only 9 per cent.
Flats have been also very popular type of properties in Oxford with approximately twenty-nine per cent. As it shown by the chart terraced houses have been occupied by people in Oxford the lowest with only twenty per cent.
According to the chart, detached houses were the most chosen property to live in Cambridge, when numbers have been about thirty-five per cent. Living in terraced houses presented the lowest number of occupants in Cambridge with nearly 18 per cent.
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries. 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 89
- Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries. 73
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...people in London, Oxford and Cambridge. it is also apparently seen that terraced h...
^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nearly sixty per cent, however living in detached houses showed the lowest percen...
^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ith approximately twenty-nine per cent. As it shown by the chart terraced houses h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02777777778 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48632680629 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9407871685 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323586934195 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1623079456 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121104646777 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206027744301 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129261862531 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.