The provided line graph illustrates percentage of people 65 and above in 100 years period from 1940 to 2040 in USA, Sweden and Japan. It is apparently seen that all compared countries showed rising tendency over the period. However over the time Japan experienced descended trend at the beginning.
According to the data USA and Sweden represented similar growing tendency with about 7 and 9 per cent in 1940, ended up in 2040 with 25 and nearly 23 per cent respectively. From 1980, both countries showed a descended tendencies and remained dropping, but in about 1990, in Sweden, population 65 and over started significantly growing reaching 20 per cent in 2010. Sweden as the only one compared country illustrated over the period fluctuated effect, but ended up with remarkable difference.
It is clear from the data that aged population in Japan had a falling tendency and remained steady till roughly 1990. After that as USA and Sweden, Japan presented ascending trend, when in about 2030, sharply rose from 10 per cent to 25 per cent respectively, ended up with about twenty-seven per cent in 2040.
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 56
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 67
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 78
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74861542939 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572972972973 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9545885452 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105046075408 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566676251843 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312301991168 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823369195899 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034593163373 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.