As the world's technologies progress more rapidly and more influential for human beings nowadays. People already can adopt numerous advanced technologies to replace old-school habits, these transformations develop human's life to another grade. I agree with this viewpoint and believe that rather than working in the office, people should select work at home by using computers or telephones.
To begin with, it is more commonly observed that the corporations recruit occupations like SOHO, which means employees can work at home via any communicators is more often, for their own beneficial considering. The companies can reduce their operating costs not only spaces and types of equipment, but the workers' insurances covering the situation the way to the workplace. For example, my friend, John, is a chief financial officer of an international IT corporation. He says since there is an alternative opportunity for staff members can accomplish their duty at home, the company scale down their budget, which is used for purchasing the pieces of equipment such as computers, working table, and other office objects, and renting the cabins. Furthermore, if there is an accident happened for their workers on their route to the company, the corporation need to cover the whole expense.
Additionally, working at home will reduce our air pollution. Nowadays, the biggest resource of air pollution is carbon dioxide attributed to taking transports such as cars, buses, and other automobiles. I use my own experience an example, the distance between my house and my working office is very far away. Every time, during the working hours, I constantly encounter a traffic congestion on the way to the office, and there are abundances of drivers like me suffer this circumstance. While we are waiting, our cars still operate and emit carbon dioxide. However, if we can complete our job at home, it will modify our air pollution gradually.
To conclude, I strongly hold that it is more beneficial for either corporations' financial way or the world environmental perspective people should manage their tasks at home instead of working in the offices.
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 75
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 70
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 60
- In this set of materials, the author of the reading passage expresses three doubts of the painting, named Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet, could not be a work by Rembrandt. However, the professor thinks that the author's hypotheses contain 70
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31085043988 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94437499121 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598240469208 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3582891423 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.733333333 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310111037355 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101901559325 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119166168427 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187019322314 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440877051488 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.