In terms of whether the online encyslopedias are less valuable than the traditional printed materials or not, The reading and listening both contradictory to each other.
The lecture that followed the passage on there are a temendous errors and lake of credentials at online encephaolpedia more than the traditional one, gave an opposite perspective. The professor refutes this by saying that there is so hard to find any traditional materials without any mistakes. Furthermore, they are not never perfect or accurate, but the online articles easy to be corrected and erase any error. On the other hand, any error at the trditional printed materials remains for decades.
Contrary to the belief in the reading passage that there are many hackers can add any mistakable informations to the online encyclopedias, the professor pointing out the strong stratagies has been created to over come these hackers activities, first strategy is they use format in the online encyclopedias so hard for any one to change it or add it. Second, special editors can monitor these articles and eliminate any change. As a result these became reliable source.
Finally, the reading avers that we can have a wrong feedback about the online encycopedias which one is important and which one is not because they are too long. The professor challenges this idea by explaining that the traditional papers having limited space. Nevertheless, the space is not considered an issue for the online encycopedias. In addition, the acadimic article can represent agreat various accurate topics. Also, we have agreat diveristy online. Consequently, online articles are so strong.
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 73
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- TPO-50 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 73
- TOEFL TPO 40 - Integrated Writing Task 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...in the online encyclopedias so hard for any one to change it or add it. Second, special...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hese articles and eliminate any change. As a result these became reliable source. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, nevertheless, second, so, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29770992366 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94880862245 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583969465649 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 78.2000313169 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0669290988754 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245915323562 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0138716843737 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0389740521979 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184012238954 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.