The provided line graph indicates the figure of users in modern technology devices in British houses and its changes between 1996 and 2003, namely CD player mobile phone, home computer and internet access from 1998 to 2002.
Overall, there is an upward trend in percentage of both devices in homes in the UK over the period shown. However, mobile phone and internet access experienced a considerable development in comparison with that of the other two.
Looking into the details, the ratio of CD player obtained the highest at below 60 percent while mobile phone and home computer received a low of around 17 percent and 27 percent in 1996/97. Then, internet access appeared in British’s homes in 1998 with the proportion at about 10 percent. The other three, meanwhile, gradually increased to the ratio by 27 percent in mobile phone, 32 percent in home computer and 66 percent with CD player.
In the 1998/99 - 2002/03 period, there is a substantial climb in the percentage of mobile phone and internet access, which showed a new trend of using modern technology. Although the figure of CD player and home computer stability grew to approximately 83 percent and 55 percent in 2002/03, mobile and internet access experienced a fast rise in vicinity of 70 percent and 45 percent.
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 89
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 80
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. 89
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 84
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69523979607 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525581395349 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.036206694 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177323770075 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089066207113 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562419723349 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123971582634 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048690669099 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.