The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year

The line graph indicates the revenue of four cafes in New York over the previous year, namely the tea room, internet express, wi-fi cafe, cafe cool.

Overall, there is a considerably fluctuation in income of both cafes over the period shown. However, the tea room witnessed a downward trend while the other three experienced the gradual growth in revenue.

It can be seen that the tea room’s revenue reached the highest at about $160.000 of four cafes in January. In the winter months, that figure dropped rapidly in vicinity of $50.000 in last month of the year.

By constract, the income of the other three received a climb by vary degrees. In the January-November period, the revenue of cafe cool not only stably went up but also achieved the highest in most months in comparison with that of cafe cool and wi-fi cafe. Nevertheless, the last of year, the income of wi-fi cafe rocketed to a peak of approximately $190.000, followed up were internet express and cafe cool at about $130.000 and $120.000

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fluctuation') instead of another adjective.
...i cafe, cafe cool. Overall, there is a considerably fluctuation in income of both cafes over the period...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83815028902 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59813569022 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1662826401 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339567950534 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138707960815 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123838321576 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211739382848 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131457311905 0.0819641961636 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.