Many people think studying in university is a waste of time and money. They are supposed that young people should work for real experience. Do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decade, countries have witnessed a struggle of high school student about what to do after their graduation. While attending college is gaining its popularity, many people depreciate this option and support working for experience. Personally, I do not entirely agree with this view because of the following reasons.
To begin with, many people in favor of working for experience because this option instills a whole array of positive traits. In particular, applying for a job, young adults need to cope with the pressure of making a living, which assist them to be more mature and dedicated. Moreover, earning money also improves their financial status, making them afford accoutrements of adolescent life and get involve in expensive leisure activities among their peers. Therefore, it is safe to say that youngsters pursuing a career, compared to their friends attending college, may find it less difficult to live independently. Another superiority of beginning career exploration early is that the earnings from youngsters’ job help families economically insofar, since the parents spend less money for their child’s items instead of paying his or her tuition fee at universities.
However, the above option also has several drawbacks. Indeed, stepping into 21st century, when industries are dominated by modern technology, facilitating many automatic processes, youngsters may not be able to compete with machines to find a universal occupation. By the same token, there are also question marks over their lack of competitiveness in rigorous recruitments for top jobs. For example, state-owned companies in Vietnam usually flinch from employing a candidate without bachelor degree to work as an officer, since the knowledge s/he acquired at high school is not as academic as that of others who were trained by outstanding scholars at universities.
In brief, the time of school-work transition still remains a dilemma what makes individual scrutinize in the future. It is because although working for experience right after graduation is advantageous; its minuses should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-07 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-01-21 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-01-19 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
| 2018-01-19 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
| 2018-01-18 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 10
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g: environment, cost). Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development? 84
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his or her tuition fee at universities. However, the above option also has sever...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in brief, in particular, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55076923077 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05801885049 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664615384615 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1116826401 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183578885403 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588675708716 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538012468995 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11007876338 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385468296824 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.