To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Throughout last centuries educational system and its various sections have considered as a vital element in human’s life. Generally, universities are counted as the most prominent part of this system whose quality has close a connection to professor’s performances. There is a substantial number of people who are of the opinion that increasing professor’s wage has a straight relationship with the promoting quality of education. I personally concur with their idea. This attitude will be exemplified in the ensuing paragraphs by focusing on three fundamental reasons.
One imperative reason coming to mind at first is that professors need a relaxed mind to focus on their job. Needless to say, their career is very crucial since their behavior and action can affect both their students and colleagues. Furthermore, doing research requires full attention. Not only does insufficient income disturb their focus to do their duties but also it may lead they abandon their job to find irrelevant one with an adequate salary. Consequently, if there was no or even careless professor, the university couldn’t be able to promote.
The second interesting point which deserves some words here is that more money can bring striking amount of productivity. Let’s imagine one university which decides to increase its overall rank as an example.by offering a good salary, this university can stimulate both its professors and other universities’ professors to compete with each other to achieve a position. As has been shown in both cases, paying more money results in more quality which easily affect university ranking.
Despite the reasoning presented in the preceding paragraphs provides sufficient confirmation for my stance on the issue, there is yet another reason that is of equal importance. By more salary, professors can be able to communicate and participate in international levels. For example, if one professor needs a student who is expert in simulation, he/she would easily choose each person in the world. Indeed, good amount of money eliminates restriction to achieve high quality.
In summary, taking all the above-mentioned ideas into consideration, one can safely assume that increasing professor’s income leads more quality in the education. The reasons for it are high motivation, high competition, and less restriction for collaborating. I firmly recommend that the government should allocate more budget to universities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 80
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 90
- TPO 30 81
- TPO32 85
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...uate salary. Consequently, if there was no or even careless professor, the univers...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58510638298 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28387127454 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603723404255 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1124723954 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210146664911 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592720135218 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627638376114 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118571151131 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734135939275 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.