The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Music is also an another form of life for us. All loves to hear songs, playing keyboards and attracted by some musicians either they are a pop singer, razz singer or melodious one. Basically we first respect their talent and addressed them with a big applause or attractiveness inside us. The fact is the real talent of musicians is directly proportional to their fame and not depends on whether they are dead or not.
Let's take an example of one of my favorite musician AR.Rahman. His musics are really mellifluous while hearing. If I'm sad or depressed, his songs literally wake up to do the things. The songs proposed by him was not only mellifluous, at the same time they are motivating. Even after he died, his music loves in the soul of all of us. We can judge people by their work that they are really talented or not whether he is dead or alive. The assessment in their talent never going to change. Not only the musicians it is same for all professionals. It is deeply about how much they love their work.
Another eminent person is Micheal Jackson. All time favorite of 90's kids, youth and also to the old ones too. His talent was recognized and emotionally touched us. He is living in the hearts of all of us. From his starting time to his end time in life or career, he gave his best. To appreciate their talent no need to wait for several years or after their death to praise them. He is awarded with lots and lots of awards for his performance.
Music is also an art that entices ourselves and make us feel special. Musicians should be rewarded for their eminent work. On the contrast, we consider the novice musicians. However we did not see them in the previous auditions or any other things. Once he performed all our appreciations makes him or her to perform a better work next time. As I mentioned above the talent is proportional to the honest assessment for them to improve their work also. It is a plus in order we gain more musicians more innovatives in music field also like a double treat to us.
In conclusion for the betterment of life of any human we need to praise thm in their on field and say them to uplift in their life. For these things we need to identify their plus and minus. After death we do not need to worry about them. Their works may be enhanced by their generations.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 58
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 23
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasksWrite a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addr 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessmentWrite a response in which you discuss the extent to which you ag 50
- The Best Way To Teach—whether As An Educator, Employer, Or Parent—is To Praise Positive Actions And Ignore Negative Ones. Write A Response In Which You Discuss The Extent To Which You Agree Or Disagree With The Claim. In Developing And Supporting Your 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a form' or 'another form'.
Suggestion: a form; another form
Music is also an another form of life for us. All loves to hear songs...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...nds on whether they are dead or not. Lets take an example of one of my favorite m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Rahman
...ample of one of my favorite musician AR.Rahman. His musics are really mellifluous whil...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...re really mellifluous while hearing. If Im sad or depressed, his songs literally w...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rast, we consider the novice musicians. However we did not see them in the previous aud...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter work next time. As I mentioned above the talent is proportional to the honest...
^^
Line 7, column 448, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...sessment for them to improve their work also. It is a plus in order we gain more mus...
^^^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... need to identify their plus and minus. After death we do not need to worry about the...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... may be enhanced by their generations.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, really, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45539906103 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48435781794 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6764418205 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.2258064516 118.986275619 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.7419354839 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.03225806452 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146381583238 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429971074718 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416081575321 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913070097614 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286052875592 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.4 14.1392134831 45% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 48.8420337079 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 12.1743820225 49% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.0 12.1639044944 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.