task 1: France, Germany
The line graph compares the proportion of women members of parliament in European nations between 2000 and 2012.
Overall, It is clear from the line graph that the number of female members of parliament of UK was by far lowest during the research period. At the same time, While the number of female in Belgium decreased, there was a sharp increase in the figure for France, UK, Italy, Germany.
In 2000, the number of female members of Germany began at about 33% and then increased gradually to 35% in 2008. The Figure for Italy, France and Belgium were lower at 27%, exactly 25%, about 17%, respectively, Whereas, the UK accounted for the lowest number with only under 5% at the same time in 2000. Despite some fluctuations, the number for Germany rose considerably throughout the period, ending at under 25% in 2012.
There was a sharp rise in the figure of Italy under 40% compared with only over 30% of France and nearly 25% of Belgium in 2012. Meanwhile, UK saw a sharp rise in the parliament, reaching a final figure of almost 23% in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-11 | hoangquang | 11 | view |
- task 1: electricity 73
- task 1: aged 65 and more 78
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- task 1: marriage and divorce 67
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67741935484 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4408365306 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7114207784 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0618576514595 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312101193721 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403467768602 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.02960287779 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302734834137 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.