task 1: the expenditure on Beef, Lamb
The line graph illustrates the consumption of four different food groups in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it is clear that while the consumption of Beef, Lamb, and Fish decreased, there was an upward trend in the amount of Chicken consumed over the 25-year period. Additionally, the figure for Fish was by far lowest during the research given.
In 1979, the expenditure on Beef began at over 200 grams per person per week and then decreased gradually to about 170 grams in next decade. At the same time, The figure for Lamb declined steadily from exactly 150 grams in 1979 to 100 grams in 1989 and then continued to fall to only above 50 at the end of the period. By contrast, the consumption of Chicken went up dramatically to almost 250 grams a person a week in 2004, which was the highest point of the whole line graph.
Although the spending on Beef fluctuated, it experienced a sharp decrease by 70 grams, ending at 100 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, only 60 grams of Fish eaten in 1979. The figure then fell slightly throughout the period to nearly 50 grams per person each week in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | khoavodoj | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | justtheanh | 78 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- task 1: China and The US 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- task 1: the consumption of four different food groups 78
- More and more people would like to pay more attention to famous people who have achieved huge success in areas such as cinema sports Why do they attract much interest from people Do you think it is good or bad 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60301507538 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49762393083 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56783919598 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6369047135 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108687117468 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425837850174 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530565829127 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602454882605 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042210232335 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.