Transportation is one of the most significant components of country's infrastructure, demanding government control and large investment of capital. People, in some countries, believe that rail communication is essential for fast and extensive transportation between cities. Another school of thought opine that budget should be distributed on renovating existing public transport.
To begin with, construction of railway lines can bring many benefits. Fast, safe rail trains are able to carry a great number of passengers, luggage and commodities at a time for large distances. Unlike other modes of transport trains are protected from the exposure to sun, rain, snow and ice, which makes traffic dependable and convenient. Moreover, the railways provide greater employment for both, unskilled and skilled labors. Another reasonable advantage is low chances of accidents and breakdowns as compared to other types of transportation. Due to these advantages, people often propose that a large amount of money should be allocated for constructing railway facilities. For instance, in large countries, such as China and India, more than 1000 billion passenger-kilometers travels across the country.
On the other hand, public transport plays a significant role in interconnecting different parts of city and the highest proportion of people use solely this system to travel to different places. Furthermore, it is affordable and easily accessible transportation facility as compared to taxi or cab. Though trains can improve the city transport infrastructure, it is not an alternative to the existing road transports. That is why many people claim that state budget should be utilised on improving the public transport for the sake of the better communication for mass people. For instance, train line in China has always contributed to a great extent to the overall transport system in the country. Nevertheless, Chinese metro system is cheap and regular that connects most corners of city and remains the main commuting mode for the citizens and tourists.
To conclude, I personally believe that, the national budget should be fairly distributed both for the improvement of the rail and public transports for the overall expansion and improvement of the transportation system.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 40
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of the young aldults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantage 95
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is imp 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, such as, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61739130435 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2481413424 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573913043478 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1736178265 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319054979171 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966216738037 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680639657022 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196236522381 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463210264401 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.