In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes

Essay topics:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport
Disucss both these views and give your own opinion.

There is a widespread belief that it is a good idea to uplift expenditures on building more new railway stations, which lets people to move fast from country to another one readily enough. It is often argued that this is a positive development, whereas some people hold the opinion that it is more preferable to invest more money on expanding and upgrading current public transport. It is agreed that an increase spending on public transport is more beneficial for many citizens. This essay will discuss both points of view before coming to a reasoned conclusion.

It is clear that the public trans...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 7.7 (8 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-23 Yasinunal 61 view
2022-07-16 MichaelP 77 view
2019-02-14 Snehagautam 73 view
2018-02-20 aigerim-09 95 view
2021-01-02 chargedbyfaith 73 view
Essays by user Odiljon :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more worthwhile by investing more money rather than constructing new railway lin...
^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es prefer invest a great amount of money on building additional railway lines bec...
^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...o it might require either chop down too much trees or demolish some recreational are...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23341523342 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96418992173 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565110565111 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4072962413 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.846153846 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3076923077 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230056479712 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876248433701 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454830913743 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153756353434 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375020281215 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.