Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion are such relationships good or not? Why?
From ancient times, animals have played an essential role in people's lives. Most individuals manifest deep affection for their pets, considering them as a part of the family. From my point of view, these kinds of bonds are highly beneficial for humans, due to the fact that pets offer help and unconditional love. I will explain my statement, in the following essay.
To begin with, animals can provide both therapeutic facilities and assistance for persons who suffer from physical disabilities. Some pets such as birds, cats or dogs are able to respond back when they receive affection from their owners, thus, it is a win-win situation since both parts experience positive feelings. I heard people saying that, after a long hard-working day, they enjoy spending evenings playing with their pets, because it helps them to release the stress accumulated during day. Moreover, trained dogs are used by blind people for guidance and for traveling from one place to another. In addition, some of these dogs are able to anticipate if their master is on the verge to suffer a heart attack or other similar medical conditions. Generally, when they feel that something bad is going to happen, they warn that person by barking or becoming agitated. I have recently seen a documentary that presented numerous cases where specialized dogs saved lives of hundreds.
Secondly, pets are beings that show devotion and tenderness without asking anything in exchange. Animals have more developed senses than humans, so they know how to treat us. They are aware if we are sad or happy. Sometimes they even try to comfort the people who are not in good spirits, other times they show endless empathy. I can speak from my own past. Back in college, I had a dog called Bobby. One day I received a very unpleasant news, and short after I experienced depression. My dog was aware of my mental state and he did not leave me, nor for one minute. He was joining me even in the bathroom. He even tried to cheer me up by doing somersaults. Most of the time I was laying down in bed, till one day when he decided to pull me out from there. Thanks to my loving dog, I understood that I have to do something to recover myself.
To sum up, animals are definitely a significant part of any family. This is because pets influence our mood in a positive way and because they are real friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-16 | evanlu | 70 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | Elena Cristina | 73 | view |
| 2017-12-12 | Khanimran007 | 60 | view |
| 2017-12-11 | yedapoda | 60 | view |
| 2016-02-29 | tahamh95 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching television is bad for children. Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 81
- Every generation of people is different in important ways. How is your generation different from your parents’ generation? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 76
- Some young children spend a great amount of their time practicing sports. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- If you could ask a famous person one question what would you ask Why 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...This is because pets influence our mood in a positive way and because they are real friends.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73607748184 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57833666224 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598062953995 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1159531083 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.24 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.52 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168165775956 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401213505547 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487495422509 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999746233878 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565820804265 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.