workweek change
The reading and the lecture are both about whether decision of reducing employee working duration from 5 days per week to 4 days per week is rational or not. The reading says that this change will increase chances of giving smoother life to employee, increase employment rate and will provide company cost benefit. However, the professor casts doubt on all the three points made in the reading.
First of all, the author of the reading states that lesser work week will reduce work pressure upon employee, and a relaxed and happy employee will make less mistakes in his job. He also notes that, this will give chance to company hire more employee, as the amount saved by reducing work week can be used in hiring process of new employee. Nevertheless, the lecturer doubts this point. He posits that hiring more employee will enhance cost, as the new recruits need tarining and more space and a computer to work, which could be avoided by not changing the work week.
Secondly, the text contends that cahnge in work week will increase the employment rate. This point is rebutted by the professor. He claims that as the company's cost will increase by recuriting more employee. Therefore, to save cost comapny will force their existing employee to complete same work in 4 days as they used to do in 5 days, thus it will not help in creating new job and will make the employee overworked for reduced salary.
Finally, the article states that this new trend of reducing work week will give employee chance to spend more time with family and indulge in his private interset or hobbies. This point is challenged by the professor. He says that this change will increase employment risk and decrease job security. With this, when economical crisis will happen the company will prefer to retain those employee who works 5 days per week and fire those who does for 4 days per week and similar biasness will be observed in scenario of getting promotion.
- workweek change 3
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 80
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism. 3
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 80
- Altruism 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk pressure upon employee, and a relaxed and happy employee will make less mistak...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...a relaxed and happy employee will make less mistakes in his job. He also notes that...
^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... decrease job security. With this, when economical crisis will happen the company will pre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this employee' or 'those employees'?
Suggestion: this employee; those employees
...appen the company will prefer to retain those employee who works 5 days per week and fire thos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 5.04856512141 376% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78635014837 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31692413166 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510385756677 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6647422394 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0391996835073 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196217788978 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403309311619 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0313994794794 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195964156426 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.