The effect on violence shown of TV, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of violence has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on the society in the recent years. In my opinion, there are no reasons why someone watching violent movies are more likely to become criminals, while others may disagree with this opinion of mine. This essay will elaborate both these sides in greater details and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why there is no connection between watching violent movies and becoming criminals, but the most conspicuos one stems from the fact that human being are smart creatures. We have the ability to think for ourselves and choose the one that is suitable. Besides, violence there are lot of other unrealistic stuff that are shown on TV, like people flying or someone coming back from the death and we don't see people believing or atempting any of those. Thus, watching voilent movies have no influence on anyone becoming a criminal.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that watching violent movies increases the chance of someone becoming criminal. There are some reasons to back that up, but the most salient one is that people try to imitate their favourite character. For instance, smoking cigaratte is quite common amongs the teenagers. They that it make them look more cool or manly. This concept is engraved is their mind because of violent movies. Hence, the things shown on violent movies have an influence on the minds of young people leading them to more criminal activities.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that parental guidance is required when children are watching violent movies.
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 72
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 78
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground.What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion? 80
- Schools should prepare students for university rather than for work How far do you agree with this statement 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'watches'.
Suggestion: watches
...inion, there are no reasons why someone watching violent movies are more likely to becom...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thus will lead to a logical conclusion. At the outset, there are numerous reason...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...meone coming back from the death and we dont see people believing or atempting any o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nfluence on anyone becoming a criminal. Nevertheless, some people adopt an oppos...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ading them to more criminal activities. From what has been discussed above, it c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0813559322 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50254911695 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1117483222 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334588426029 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969069982707 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831434500561 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180534560657 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745163248713 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.