In the modern world, technological breakthroughs have made changes to every facet of humankind, including the way people work. As a matter of fact, the number of those who are computer- literate is increasing, leading to the prevalence of working from home. Despite some undeniable advantages, many drawbacks should be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, no one can deny the fact that working at home can bring certain benefits to the society. The most significant point is that the corporate organization has no longer need giant office space, which by consequence reduces substantial sums of money. Besides, employees can enjoy freedom. That is to say, executives can efficiently prioritize their works coordinating their work schedule with family and personal tasks. This opportunity is simply great for those with physical disabilities and single parent homes.
On the other hand, i personally opine that it is not a good practice to work for office staying at home. It is essential for people to go to office. The first reason is about human communication. Long hours spent in a computer- based working environment really discourages real interaction while in the workplace, colleagues can exchange words and enhance their interpersonal skills. Even, becoming over- reliant on computers could trigger a mental illness such as autism if workers segrerate themselves from the human contact in the long run. Moreover, although office distractions are avoided by working at home, some different distractions may rise. The temptation to engage in household matters since you are at home is very often. Suddenly you may start feeling obliged to clean the home, do the shopping, the childcare or the cooking. Consequently, workers may be not as productive as compared to the time of working at their workplace.
In conclusion, although positive impacts of work from home option on modern people are considered, i am firmly convinced that it drawbacks are much weightier than the advantages. People should draw a line between home and work so as to avoid both areas of sufferings.
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress. What do you think are the cause of this? Can you suggest some possible solution? 73
- As water is a valuable resource governments all over the world should control how much water their citizens use To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 74
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- There are social, medical, and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones.What forms do they take?Do you agree the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits? 84
- Computers do not help children learn more effectively On the contrary the use of computers has a negative effect on children s physical and mental development To what exten do you agree or disargee 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s a matter of fact, the number of those who are computer- literate is increasing, leadi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...option on modern people are considered, i am firmly convinced that it drawbacks a...
^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hould draw a line between home and work so as to avoid both areas of sufferings.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, really, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23582089552 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95493138911 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620895522388 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2223885596 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3157894737 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312954988031 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842065551064 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493419574367 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171049907958 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500712643864 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.