Most of the employers prefer academic qualification rather than life experience or personal qualities when looking for new employees. Why does it happening and is it a positive or negative development
These days, when an employer is looking to hire they chose candidates with academic qualifications over people with life experiences or personal qualities. In my opinion, I think that candidates with academic skills should be highly considered for employment as they will greatly benefit both the company and society.
A good reason for the employer to select a candidate with academic qualifications is the time and effort they will save as the applicant has all the training needed for the job. In addition, those individuals will be more productive, work faster, and complete the tasks they are expected to do. As a result, they will help the company grow faster and achieve greater success.
Another point to consider is that candidates who have an academic background are more accustomed to deadlines. These candidates will have better time managements skills and work well under pressure. Therefore, they will be able to meet critical project due dates and contribute a greater amount of work.
Finally, candidates with an academic background were involved in many projects which give them a greater opportunity to expand their team player qualities. In other words, these candidates have good communication skills with their team, and are more open to collaboration with others. Consequently, they can make a huge impact on the company’s reputation.
In conclusion, although searching for the right employee may be hard, if the employer is focusing on company needs, and takes in to account all the benefits the candidate with an academic background may bring the decision will be much easier.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-05-08 | Azadabdullah | 73 | view |
2018-03-21 | vict0ria92 | 100 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. 78
- Some people think that robots are important for humans future development other think that robots have a negative effect on society 68
- Most of the employers prefer academic qualification rather than life experience or personal qualities when looking for new employees. Why does it happening and is it a positive or negative development 100
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having one lang 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29571984436 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9044392548 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568093385214 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1329600178 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.416666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111482609552 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458549492142 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668637809814 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720702924612 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657824322576 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.