As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
It is irrefutable that longevity of human life span is one of the top priorities of modern medical science. While, some opponents argued that long life with medical assistance is necessary to ensure betterment of human endeavor, adherents of natural selection of life state different views. Considering the increasing wealth of knowledge every individual collects and disseminates to the society, I profoundly inclined to believe that artificial ways to increased life span is of minuscule application to overall wellbeing of human kind.
On one hand, there are several obvious reasons why nature has set the life span of each species. Firstly, with every living thing having its own limit of lifetime, there are several challenges it must face to complete that life span. During any such challenge, many times, the living being would succumb to the injuries. For example, human die of some disease early in their life if they are not cured by their own body or by medical assistance.
Secondly, the main purpose of medical science should not be to alter the path of nature; instead, it should be supportive. For example, promotion of healthy lifestyle has long-term benefits than the artificial supplements on every human.
On the other hand, according to opponents of natural selection scheme, there are many disadvantages associated with it. Primarily, the time invested in every human is considered too precious to be lost to some virus or epidemic. However, the lives that still alive are destined to be more successful than the one referred earlier.
To recapitulate, I pen down by saying that, while some people tend to argue that advancement in medical science to support long life is extremely valuable, I highly believe that natural selection procedure is the only provider of high quality human life, as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | vahid najafi | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | vahid najafi | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | vahid najafi | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | vahid najafi | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | sanazlarijani | 88 | view |
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive inproviding goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true ascomputers have proved disappointing in terms of producti 80
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 63
- As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 80
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 11
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16835016835 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75677191739 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8157753824 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.076923077 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115044818239 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395738673791 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320321584578 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645049039702 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314489107052 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.