the charts show the number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 and Marital status of adults Americans, 1970 and 2000.

The information presented in thus two chart illustrates the rates of person, who are married and divorced, comparative by the change adult's marital status in the United States of America in the period of time, where are between 1970 and 2000.
As an overall trend, we can see clearly that the marriage's rates were obviously share dropped.The majority of adults preferred to be in a marriage relationship.
Turning in the first graph, it seem that the average of marriage significantly more decreased by nearly about 500.000 thousands in the end of period. USA has a marriage's number approximately 2 millions, while in 2000 she has about 2.5 millions. In contrast, there were fluctuation in divorce rates, which is reach a pinpoint under than 1.5 millions in the second time (1980).
The second figure shows definitively that the amount of adults, who are married, obvious slightly went down by about one to ten .Meanwhile, it is the highest amount in the bar throughout the period. Additionally, the amount of adults, who are widowed, decreased compared by the rates of adults divorced, which is dramatically risen around 5% in the end of period.
By the way, the amount of adults, who are never married increase slightly where was under than 20% in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'chart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The information presented in thus two chart illustrates the rates of person, who ar...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... in the United States of America in the period of time, where are between 1970 and 2000. As a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ages rates were obviously share dropped.The majority of adults preferred to be in a...
^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...onship. Turning in the first graph, it seem that the average of marriage significan...
^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a marriage' or simply 'marriages'?
Suggestion: a marriage; marriages
...thousands in the end of period. USA has a marriages number approximately 2 millions, while ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s slightly went down by about one to ten .Meanwhile, it is the highest amount in t...
^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...slightly went down by about one to ten .Meanwhile, it is the highest amount in the bar th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, which is dramatically risen around 5% in the end of period. By the way, the a...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...htly where was under than 20% in 2000.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, thus, while, in contrast, by the way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97156398104 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78689105508 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578199052133 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1827884819 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.125 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240491800328 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912397336288 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823756869559 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116325919718 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750585598152 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.