Evaluate a public place. Suggest how it could be made more appealing.
It should be 500 words (+/- 10%) in length.
The Old Quarter - a huge change for the stability
Old Quarter - a large historical area which tourists cannot skip when visiting Hanoi. It had 36 streets which are told in folk poems and tales since thousands years ago. However, the place has become extremely chaos and polluted as the consequences of the population increase and the local government’s irresponsibility. This essay will describe the Old Quarter features, and according to that, the author will also give some recommendations to the city authority which help to solve some issues which it has been confronted.
The Old Quarter is a crucial zone of Hanoi city. It is the heart of the city where contains many complex of ancient buildings and houses. The area is also national political and public administration center of Vietnam. Therefore, it has greatly modern and luxury architecture which are the governmental offices and international hotels, such as, National Convention Center or Hilton hotel. Additionally, crowded streets, cramped roads, and small pavements are one of the stand out characteristics of the Old Quarter, Hang Ma street is a typical example for this.
The Old Quarter is the capital’s center. It has the road system which is closed for walking in the weekend. Indeed, tourists and local people have been attracted to come there for enjoying the “Hanoi’s spirit”. The majority of roads and streets are small and narrow, thus, there is not enough space for pedestrians. Information providing points for tourists and foreigners are a weakness of the Old Quarter. Consequently, finding support tends to be an adversity when travelling around this centered zone. As the result of a city’s poor management on protecting environment and current traffic state, the citizens and visitors have been suffered the dirt and pollution here. The situation even becomes more serious by cause of the increasing of cars in recent years.
To address the issues mentioned, firstly, the government should quickly improve the traffic quality by encouraging the development of public transportation system surrounding the area, such as metro or buses. Moreover, private motorbikes and cars should be prohibited to enter the city center following daily schedule. Secondly, building more new information booths could support tourists and it will promote the tourism service at the Old Quarter. One more thing, to enhance the sightseeing, the government has drastically to prepare for expanding Old Quarter’s pavement. This might not easy to operate, however, government has to satisfy short term benefits to overcome completely these problems.
In conclusion, the Old Quarter are playing a great role in the development of Vietnam’s capital city. It is the reflection of the change of the country. Many cultural, political and economic values of this nation are subsisting in and around this area. Unfortunately, all these wonderful national heritages are in emergency on account of the pollution, traffic jam and lack of space. Accordingly, managing the transportation and private vehicles is necessary to increase air and traffic quality of the place. Furthermore, Hanoi’s city council should consider the ideas which are expanding the pavement systems and providing more support point to help maintain the effectiveness of Hanoi’s tourism. All these solutions will be the key factor to the stability of the national capital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-29 | FalexPingu | 36 | view |
- Evaluate a public place Suggest how it could be made more appealing It should be 500 words 10 in length 36
- Evaluate a public place Suggest how it could be made more appealing 55
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support the received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 to 1996.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 67
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is waste of valuable money What is your opinion 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y Old Quarter - a large historical area which tourists cannot skip when visiting...
^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Quarter features, and according to that, the author will also give some recommend...
^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l zone of Hanoi city. It is the heart of the city where contains many complex of ...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on hotel. Additionally, crowded streets, cramped roads, and small pavements are o...
^^
Line 4, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elling around this centered zone. As the result of a city's poor management ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2914.0 1977.66487455 147% => OK
No of words: 534.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45692883895 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13384635597 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533707865169 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 898.2 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7280326914 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.482758621 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4137931034 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13793103448 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0773504017353 0.236089414692 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214257290912 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308640904756 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407243582148 0.150856017488 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399374603746 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 86.8835125448 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 0.2 Out of 6.0
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.