“According to a recent report from our marketing department,
during the past year, fewer people attended Super
Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the
percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about
specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past
year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching
enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not
with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of
awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super
Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget
next year to reaching the public through advertising.”
Super Screen Produced movie production believes that some viewer will be increase through the advertisement. They claim some reason why less number of people attend the movie even the movie was so good quality. Although, statement is quite flawed.
Firstly, marketing department should state the number of people who attend the film. Without actual number the report created by the marketing department is quit equivocal and vague. Moreover, percentage of positive review about the movie increased over the last year. Clearly this statement has a flawed because there is not specific number of attendance.
Secondly, super screen production movie team clearly specified that reviews of the movie are not received by the prospective viewer. May be it is quite true but, present time technology so advance that people always get information about the movie content, review, storyline of the movie. Moreover, every movie is not made for all people, they surely have a target viewer. For example, action films are actually made for eighteen to thirty years old people. Animation movie are normally made for children and pre-teenage viewer. So, the viewer might not like the content.
Another one, production group think that, promotion should increase the movie viewer. But, low budget film sometimes got large number of viewer with their storyline, character, presentation, action. It depends on viewer aspect which type of film they expect. So, promotion or advertising the film may not helpful in this case.
Examining various factors and reasoning it can conclude that, it might not be a good idea for increasing the budget of the film next year. The super screen production should realize the major mistake of their action and then necessary to take further steps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-09 | Seema Modak | 37 | view |
- tpo 25In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to makedecisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning." 33
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppor 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 282 350
No. of Characters: 1442 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.098 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.113 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.422 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.842 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.112 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.552 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...vie even the movie was so good quality. Although, statement is quite flawed. Firstly, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: Maybe
...not received by the prospective viewer. May be it is quite true but, present time tech...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the film may not helpful in this case. Examining various factors and reasoning ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 55.5748502994 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 282.0 441.139720559 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28368794326 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50008802219 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581560283688 0.468620217663 124% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1641859884 57.8364921388 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.4210526316 119.503703932 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8421052632 23.324526521 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241616997779 0.218282227539 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758743740173 0.0743258471296 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784631514437 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136107166402 0.128457276422 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741416004222 0.0628817314937 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.3799401198 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.3550499002 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.197005988 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 12.3882235529 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.