"To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into major supermarkets, where it hopes word-of-mouth advertising will sustain sales

The business plan presented by Apex Corporation is fairly reasonable, but a large part of the argument is supported by unwarrented assumptions and is extremely flawed making the argument completely unreasonable. The following paragraphs examines the assumptions made by the author of the argument.

The first ever sentence says there is an increased demand for artisan coffee. This is an unsupported claim. This is the whole point of the argument and this assumption makes it an unwarrented one. Another assumption in the same sentence is that the 'Gourmet Select' variety of coffee is what artisan coffee means. The company must've had feedback sessions, tasting sessions, etc. to make a hard stand point to make such a drastic move.

The assumption that people will buy the new coffee line through word-of-mouth advertising is a major flaw. Why will people leave their regular coffee and try a new coffee that they have not heard of before? This point can be made more reasonable by starting off the sales my giving out free samples of the new coffee, so that , people would buy the new coffee line by experiencing it beforehand.

Another assumption is that major restaurant chains would buy the new coffee. No evidence is given in the argument as to under what claims would the restaurants buy the new coffee. This part of assumption is completely neglected in the argument.

Also the television and radio advertising campaign is unwarrented. This assumption has no evidence that this will work out. The company must have given some proof that this type of strategy has worked out before in some other product similar to 'Gourmet Select'.

If the above mentioned issues and assumptions are corrected by giving reasonable evidences and proof, the argument will be valid and will be a strong business plan by Apex Corporation to achieve the 'top sellers in coffee market' standard.

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'examine'.
Suggestion: examine
... unreasonable. The following paragraphs examines the assumptions made by the author of t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... made by the author of the argument. The first ever sentence says there is an in...
^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased demand for artisan coffee. This is an unsupported claim. This is the whole ...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: must've
... what artisan coffee means. The company mustve had feedback sessions, tasting sessions...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... free samples of the new coffee, so that , people would buy the new coffee line by...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ompletely neglected in the argument. Also the television and radio advertising ca...
^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: must've
...ce that this will work out. The company mustve given some proof that this type of stra...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 2260.96107784 71% => OK
No of words: 310.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20322580645 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92640540518 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503225806452 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.0917876951 57.8364921388 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6111111111 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 23.324526521 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72222222222 5.70786347227 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302310663051 0.218282227539 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872570121664 0.0743258471296 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085543585524 0.0701772020484 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145417179531 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623592019286 0.0628817314937 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1538 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.929 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.695 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.353 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.035 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.353 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.638 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.13 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5