The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. This is a healthy practice and can be followed in any situation, where there is a responsibility of leadership. The following paragraphs has examples and scenarios that supports my stance and to make my argument reasonable.
The judicial system of any free country is built upon the value of feedback. When a leader of a particular party is in power it is compulsive that the opposition party along with any general public to evaluate the actions of the ruling team and critizise them in every way possible. Also it is the feedback of the people that elects the leader of an entire government. It is important to provide feedback whenever and whereever possible to run a healthy and successfull government.
Another important attribute of providing feedback is that, it gives the people, who provide feedback, a sense of self worth. By asking to provide feedback, the people get the satisfaction that there is a combined effort in developing whatever the leader is upto. Eventhough it is upto to the leader to accept the feedback, even the small thought that the teamplayers have a small say in the whole picture means a lot to them.
Sometimes there are situations where it is best not to encourage feedbacks. For example in negative places like prison, the inmates are not in best terms with the jailers. Encouraging feedback in this kind of situation is not advisable as it is a waste of time and effort as we know what will be the result.
However, by accepting feedback the leader also has his own benifits. The leader knows exactly how his team feels on his every move and what his team thinks about his work. This makes a ground for the leader to improve on himself by identifing his mistakes and to improve on it whereever possible. The whole feedback theory has a moral ground on which the leader can build a better himself.
The whole theory of feedback is a new ground in many places. Since people used to blindly follow where their leader takes them in older times (during kings rule) this new concept of feedback sets a higher moral ground where it is the cobined effort of the common people and their leader that brings them to greatness. Feedbacks are not only advantageous to the team members but also to their leader. So having feedbacks and acting upon them is a thing that only best leaders do.
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 58
- "To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into major supermarkets, where it hopes word-of-mouth advertising will sustain sales 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...of leadership. The following paragraphs has examples and scenarios that supports my...
^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hat the opposition party along with any general public to evaluate the actions of the ruling t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d critizise them in every way possible. Also it is the feedback of the people that e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74047619048 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57651503105 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1084691755 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8095238095 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394471506809 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129511846226 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20161060646 0.0758088955206 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195435967764 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105413291858 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.