The writer cites about the need of new improvised road projects that Prunty County should implement in order to decrease the rate of road accidents, as enforcing the 45 mph speed limit rule wasn't adequate enough to lower the rate. Furthermore, it is assumed that administering such projects will ensure the safety of drivers and reduce the rates of road accidents.
Firstly, the writer states that even after the enforcement of 45 mph speed limit rule, the number of accidents has not decreased and many drivers are going beyond the speed limit. However, the writer has failed to bolster this statement due to lack of concrete evidence like the number of people exceeding the speed limit; is the number adequate enough to be take into consideration. Furthermore there is no mention of any other factors responsible for road accidents such as the condition of roads, lack of visibility due to insufficient lighting and the width of the roads. The writer seems to have assumed speed as the only cause and failed to strengthen his assumption.
Secondly, the writer urges the Prunty County to undertake similar road development projects that Butler County completed five years ago. The writer makes an attempt to support this statement by stating that the rate of road accidents decreased by 25 percent. However, still the lack of more data is leading to weaken this statement. The amount invested in completing those projects; for example, the financial ability of the Prunty County may not be as good as Butler County. The exact number of decrease in the rate of accidents; for example, if we consider the rate of accidents as 100 people per year then according to data provided the current rate will be 75 people per year. Thus, even after five years does this amount of decrease has enough weight considering the time and amount of money spent? Hence, due to lack exact figures has crippled the writer's statement.
In the end, due to insufficient data and failing to take other variables into consideration the writer's statements could not be agreed with completely.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 348 350
No. of Characters: 1689 1500
No. of Different Words: 161 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.319 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.853 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.54 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 121 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.741 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.373 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.435 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...s enforcing the 45 mph speed limit rule wasnt adequate enough to lower the rate. Furt...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...e enough to be take into consideration. Furthermore there is no mention of any other factor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 676, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd failed to strengthen his assumption. Secondly, the writer urges the Prunty Co...
^^^
Line 3, column 855, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... to lack exact figures has crippled the writers statement. In the end, due to insuffic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, still, then, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 347.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96541786744 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6106997099 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495677233429 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.887836639 57.8364921388 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.071428571 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 23.324526521 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.70786347227 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19942374059 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709023369728 0.0743258471296 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485888692912 0.0701772020484 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10960276507 0.128457276422 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565479527037 0.0628817314937 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.