The author of the newspaper editorial believes that illegal immigrants must be made to return to their own countries and gives a reason why he believes so. The author mentions that a number of illegal immigrants entering need to be checked and failing to do so would endanger the economy and the national identity of the country.
First and foremost, the author did not provide a supporting example to bolster his claim. Only by mentioning valid evidence, that the entering of such immigrants leads to something that potentially could harm the country, can any sort of action be taken. Without any such evidence to support his claim, the author has labeled the immigrants as a threat.
Additionally, the author of the article mentioned the word "threat" but did not explain what sort of threat the immigrants would pose. He confidently believes that the immigrants would pose some sort of threat to the nation but does not mention what type of threat they would pose. Maybe the threat is something that could affect the nation severely like an increase in the population, due to a large number of immigrants. This could lead to a scarcity of resources and affect the natives of the country. These resources could be from basics such as food, water, and shelter and as large as education and job opportunities.
Therefore, if the threat is a large-scale problem for the country like the natives of the nation having their job and education opportunities stolen by the immigrants then it would pose a serious problem since it would have a direct effect on the morale of the nation's natives and also the economy of the nation. It would affect the morale of the natives since they wouldn't have sufficient job and education opportunities and the economy since the natives would then need aid from the government for their living.
In conclusion, the argument, in its current form, is flawed as lacks sufficient evidence to support its claims. The inclusion of more robust and relevant evidence would enhance the argument's effectiveness by providing a stronger foundation for its conclusions and increasing its credibility. Without such evidence, the argument remains unconvincing and fails to adequately support its claim. For this argument to be more compelling and persuasive, it is imperative to incorporate additional well-researched evidence that directly relates to the points being made.
- People often tend to focus on the delivery of a message than the actual content 50
- The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Because illegal immigrants pose such threats every effort mu 48
e-rater score report
flaws:
the third argument is wrong
=====================
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 394 350
No. of Characters: 1963 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.455 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.982 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.773 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.623 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.35 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.631 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.174 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e an increase in the population, due to a large number of immigrants. This could lead to a scarci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ct the morale of the natives since they wouldnt have sufficient job and education oppor...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...and relevant evidence would enhance the arguments effectiveness by providing a stronger f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 393.0 441.139720559 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13740458015 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90403146111 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458015267176 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.334036294 57.8364921388 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.1875 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5625 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287594674636 0.218282227539 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956954718048 0.0743258471296 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732000619046 0.0701772020484 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157687540338 0.128457276422 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686633579492 0.0628817314937 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.