The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago, and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing prices in Maple County.
The whole argument focuses on restriction of farmland development and its repercussions. Also this argument provides the references given by the proponents and opponents. But when we more scrutinize this argument we came across many other factors which council should account before it predicts the rise in property prices.
The farmland development cannot be directly linked to the prices rise in Maple County. As many factors such as county’s economy, people inclination towards buying new property, industries present, tourism, etc. shall be considered.
These aspects of development also drives the housing prices in the county. When opponents mentioned of Pine County which had restricted development 15 years ago, may have been due to some other reasons. Moreover, we do not have much information about the Pine County, such as geographical location, industrial development in Pine County area, these facets can catalyst the process of inflation in that particular area which can lead to increased housing prices in Pine County.
On the other hand, Proponents mentions the Chestnut County’s decision which did not have an impact on housing prices. However, they did not mention the other reasons which can also be a part of this phenomenon, such as, It is quite possible that the population density of Chestnut County is less. That population is major of immigrants or there is slow or no industrial growth. These factors contribute a lot to housing prices, take an example of Delhi, India here, despite no restriction on the farmland development the housing prices are on consistent rise, which can directly related to the industrial growth in that area.
Although, comparisons seems good, but council prediction is unsound as facts need more clarification
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 82 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | samramjam12345 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 63 | view |
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limi 46
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 83
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 278 350
No. of Characters: 1451 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.083 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.219 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.768 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.385 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.285 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.367 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.138 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...land development and its repercussions. Also this argument provides the references g...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 278.0 441.139720559 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41726618705 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89291838133 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564748201439 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.2502984206 57.8364921388 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171719000979 0.218282227539 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620776044279 0.0743258471296 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050785157159 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942210329355 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390499289005 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 12.3882235529 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.