Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
The definition for success vary greatly from person to person, for some it is accumulation of great wealth and for some people it is perfection in their skill. Successful people have put a lot of effort to reach the place as they are today. Success is the product of hard work, persistence, passion, patience, set-backs and in some amount luck. These things are in control of person who aspires to successful. Education institutions such as schools, colleges, universities have a structured way of doing things. And personal success linked to scores they receive in curriculum, however student can have one field of study as a hobby and other as a passion. Educational institutions should not dissuade students in selecting which field of study they should pursue.
The reason educational institutes should not do this is sometimes instead of having a positive effect on students it can backfire and can completely destroy the students career as educational institutes will not want this, students should persuade to learn their field of interest. Interest is the main driver in achieving the success. Which can anything from short-term goal setting or long-term. We can find many success stories which are not created by dissuading someone to not study field where he does not score well, but instead letting students do, they interested in. Dissuading someone to not study the certain field of study can have lower the moral of students. Moreover, in extreme cases students can decide to drop out from school, college.
Talking about the successful students we can look at the enormous amount of stories in the developing countries where there is a student being responsible for earning money for family pursue education in the field of study they want and not only become successful but become an inspiration to others. Take an example of great sportsman in indian history Sachin Tendulkar, instead of being not so good in academics he triumph the field of sports, particularly cricket.
We can find many such examples in our society.
However, educational institutions can offer consultations to students who are willing to change the field of study. So that, they become a responsible, self-motivated professional who sets up good ethics and inspiration for others.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 83
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limi 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h field of study they should pursue. The reason educational institutes should...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cide to drop out from school, college. Talking about the successful students we...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'triumphs'.
Suggestion: triumphs
...ad of being not so good in academics he triumph the field of sports, particularly crick...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... many such examples in our society. However, educational institutions can of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, moreover, so, well, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18699186992 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8338772954 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520325203252 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3961832302 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386108300416 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118694940311 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108340996675 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184521790825 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113659901255 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.