even years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property values in Deerhaven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on landscaping and house painting.
In this letter, a committee of Deerhaven Acres homeowners recommends that in order to enhance of Deerhaven property values, homeowners should follow some restrictions concerning home’s exterior appearance. To prove that the recommendation, the Brookville community adopted similar restrictions and average property values have tripled in seven years. However, this recommendation cannot be accepted as it is in that it rests on a number of premises all of which can be challenged in one way or another.
The first problem with the argument is that the committee assumes that increasing of brookville property values because of home’s exterior appearance. However, there is no evidence to prove that rising of property values happened because of some restrictions such as landscaping and painting of home’s exterior appearance. For instance, maybe the property of value is a function of demand and supply. Perhaps the demand for housing has increased due to an influx of major employers. Or, perhaps the supply for housing has decreased. Either scenario would provide an alternative explanation for the increase in property values.
Another problem with the argument is that the committee assumes that the Brookville is identical to the Deerhaven Acres in all respects. However, there is no evidence to prove that this is case. Maybe people in Brookville have better economic conditions than people in Deerhaven Acres. Or maybe the personalities in two communities, their tastes and life styles are different from each other. For instance, people in Deerhaven Acres do not like to change their home’s exterior appearance.
A third problem with the argument is that the committee assumes that things remain same all over the years. However, in most cases this is not true. Maybe seven years ago people are not more open and liberal and like unified community yards and colors. But now people pay more attention to the home’s insides and facilities than exterior appearance.
In the final analysis, the committee’s recommendation cannot be taken to be correct, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above. It depends on a number of assumptions each of which is questionable. The recommendation can only be accepted if the weaknesses already referred to are all removed.
- For the past five years Mr Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School and during that time the school band from Steel City High has won three regional band competitions In addition the quality of the music rehearsal facilities an 35
- For the past five years, Mr. Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School, and during that time the school band from Steel City High has won three regional band competitions. In addition, the quality of the music rehearsal faciliti 35
- even years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookvi 58
- "For the past five years, Mr. Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School, and during that time the school band from Steel City High has won three regional band competitions. In addition, the quality of the music rehearsal facilit 35
- One recent research study has indicated that many adolescents need more sleep than they are getting, and another study has shown that many high school students in our city are actually dissatisfied with their own academic performance. As a way of combatin 75
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'third', 'for instance', 'such as', 'in most cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272040302267 0.25644967241 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.138539042821 0.15541462614 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0755667506297 0.0836205057962 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0503778337531 0.0520304965353 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0151133501259 0.0272364105082 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.153652392947 0.125424944231 123% => OK
Participles: 0.0327455919395 0.0416121511921 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.98309270555 2.79052419416 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0251889168766 0.026700313972 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115869017632 0.113004496875 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151133501259 0.0255425247493 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00503778337531 0.0127820249294 39% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2279.0 2731.13054187 83% => OK
No of words: 361.0 446.07635468 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.31301939058 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.423822714681 0.378187486979 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.337950138504 0.287650121315 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.257617728532 0.208842608468 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152354570637 0.135150697306 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98309270555 2.79052419416 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 207.018472906 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462603878116 0.469332199767 99% => OK
Word variations: 47.8699407831 52.1807786196 92% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.039408867 105% => OK
Sentence length: 17.1904761905 23.2022227129 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.086988081 57.7814097925 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.523809524 141.986410481 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1904761905 23.2022227129 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.47619047619 0.724660767414 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 50.9854900409 51.9672348444 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.24691358025 1.8405768891 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371861508834 0.441005458295 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133051025366 0.135418324435 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.115071783661 0.0829849096947 139% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.50634044077 0.58762219726 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.125796128523 0.147661913831 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134268672654 0.193483328276 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788025649616 0.0970749176394 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.334357757707 0.42659136922 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0869623213023 0.0774707102158 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247803453369 0.312017818177 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857818937833 0.0698173142475 123% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 5.36822660099 168% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.