Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at this dramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors
With the information provided, this assumption leading to conclusion remains unfounded. This argument is well presented yet fat-fetched. This argument claims that Omega University fulfill a new method for evaluating their professors in the college. This event lead to overall grated have increased as soon as possible. Hence this conclusion is ill-founded.
The primary assumption underlying the author's conclusion that this grade is not candid. Indeed this point is not real ability of student during education. Nevertheless, he fails to preclude other possible reason that their point is authentic. It might be possible that student increase their attendance in the library. Perhaps, student work diligently and they focus better than past. It might be current and previous teaching method of professor has changed due to new policy in the class. Previous and current level of student like amount of avid has augmented.
Furthermore, the author avers that they have not been successful as getting jobs comparison in to Alpha University. However, this comparison is not valid due to the fact the perhaps level of intellectual are different each other. So, to reinforce the argument the author should have provided information about level of student together.
Moreover, the author of the assumption assumes that curbing evaluation of professors is a essential point for getting a secure jobs in the society. Without considering and ruling that makes the assumption of the author that career service is inadequate. In fact, without accounting for their factors that might be contribute to Omega graduate lack of success in getting jobs. The dean cannot be decided that as long as we discontinue this trend will be more likely to hire Omega graduates.
In short, as discussed, the conclusion cannot be tenable. The author of the assumption should have discussed about previous level of professor and student especially duration in library and so forth. Besides the author should not compare this University. On the other hand to make a rigid conclusion is very myopic observation. After all, feckless attempt with a fallible method could be noting with a fool’s errand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | tomlee0205 | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | shubham1102 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | fangzr2 | 58 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | devansh66 | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | devansh66 | 66 | view |
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
- "During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job acc 66
- Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 50
- 1. As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Eucation children is more a difficult task day than it was in the past because they spend so much them on cell phone, online games, and social networking web site؟ 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uating their professors in the college. This event lead to overall grated have incre...
^^^^
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ted have increased as soon as possible. Hence this conclusion is ill-founded. The ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... The primary assumption underlying the authors conclusion that this grade is not candi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...nclusion that this grade is not candid. Indeed this point is not real ability of stude...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hat curbing evaluation of professors is a essential point for getting a secure jo...
^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'job'?
Suggestion: job
... a essential point for getting a secure jobs in the society. Without considering and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, well, after all, in fact, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 343.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37026239067 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80688528498 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521865889213 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2318956246 57.8364921388 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.75 119.503703932 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2916666667 23.324526521 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.70786347227 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157086884055 0.218282227539 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438803834141 0.0743258471296 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529917366804 0.0701772020484 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866474735786 0.128457276422 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360900581143 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.3799401198 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.3550499002 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.197005988 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.