The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author claims that Seatown University should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the sheer purprose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors. The author believes that based on the study conducted by Oceania University that showed higher faculty retention when the professors at the university were offered a free-tuition policy for their own college-aged children. The author's claim is not well-reasoned, as it believes that since the free-tuition policy resulted to be fruitful for Oceania University, Seatown University should implement the same policy to lure new professors.
At first, the author claims that Seatown University should implement the free-tuition policy as it would help in enhancing morale among the faculty and lure new professors based on the study conducted by Oceania University that resulted to be a success is flawed. The Oceania University would have conducted their study while taking merely 10 people into consideration and the result was that, 7 faculty decided to stay back at the university and offered them free tuition for their children. If the study was conducted on 25 faculty members and only 7 faculty members decided to stay back at the university since the university provided a free-tuition policy.
To conclude that, the author claims that Seatown University should implement the free-tuition policy is flawed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | DCAD123 | 65 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | ZAINBM | 33 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 66 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | landerson1 | 58 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | magaashok | 59 | view |
- Today more people are overweight than ever before What in your opinion are the primary causes of this What are the main effects of this epidemic 71
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at lea 73
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 55
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 33
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cy for their own college-aged children. The authors claim is not well-reasoned, as ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 55.5748502994 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 2260.96107784 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 217.0 441.139720559 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47926267281 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92260375194 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 204.123752495 44% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414746543779 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 705.55239521 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6280436502 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.857142857 119.503703932 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 23.324526521 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49359035217 0.218282227539 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.298392959849 0.0743258471296 401% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117986338378 0.0701772020484 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349193354327 0.128457276422 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129052323584 0.0628817314937 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 14.3799401198 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.3550499002 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.197005988 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.5979740519 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 98.500998004 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cy for their own college-aged children. The authors claim is not well-reasoned, as ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 55.5748502994 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 2260.96107784 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 217.0 441.139720559 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47926267281 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92260375194 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 204.123752495 44% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414746543779 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 705.55239521 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6280436502 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.857142857 119.503703932 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 23.324526521 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49359035217 0.218282227539 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.298392959849 0.0743258471296 401% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117986338378 0.0701772020484 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349193354327 0.128457276422 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129052323584 0.0628817314937 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 14.3799401198 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.3550499002 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.197005988 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.5979740519 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 98.500998004 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.