The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
If the workers in any Company are getting some good benefits, it will definitely helps their efficiency and also encourage such company retain their workers for long. However, the claim that the retention of faculty Professors will be enhanced by offering free tuition at university for their own college aged-children is not substantiated with enough prooves, so this should not be welcome by the Seatown institute; unless some of the controversial questions are being answered.
Firstly, the study carried out in Oceania university alone, is not enough to substantiate the proof. Using a large number of universities as survey specimen, will help to know if this is exactly true, or it only happened by chance or other reasons in Oceania university. It could be that not collecting the Professor’s children tuition fee is not the only thing that the school is doing for their Professors, what if their salary is also encouraging, or they have good climate conditions ? Using just one school as an evidence is not enough.
Also, the Seatown institutes need to be wise and compare the Ocenia school with them, to know if they have the same favourable conditions. That is, they need to check if they are dealing with the same number of professors, for example Oceania university may only have twenty professors, whereas the Seatown institute is having sixty professors. Will they be able to sustain this, if they eventually start waiving the Professor’s children school fees, so that they do not at the end run into dept that will eventually cause their Professors to leave the school.
Researching sustainable factors that could help Seatown Institute to sustain their professors for long, will be of paramount help than to follow what Oceania Univerities are doing that may not eventually work for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | DCAD123 | 65 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | ZAINBM | 33 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 66 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | landerson1 | 58 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | magaashok | 59 | view |
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 60
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 297 350
No. of Characters: 1476 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.151 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.97 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.685 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.498 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.9 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.392 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.65 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
... some good benefits, it will definitely helps their efficiency and also encourage suc...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...elcome by the Seatown institute; unless some of the controversial questions are being answe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...enough to substantiate the proof. Using a large number of universities as survey specimen, will h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 55.5748502994 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 297.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12457912458 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79675792149 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521885521886 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9799971006 57.8364921388 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.2 119.503703932 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7 23.324526521 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.70786347227 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191533148746 0.218282227539 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079099067604 0.0743258471296 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655626195972 0.0701772020484 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122573616899 0.128457276422 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341044582867 0.0628817314937 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.3799401198 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.3550499002 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.